Paul Newman and Robert Redford posing in retro-country graphics on a poster for George Roy Hill's Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid |
QUICK REVIEW:
Two American crime-legends robbed banks and trains in the Wild West, until they decided to flee to Bolivia with a woman. SPOILER And here they both got shot.
Cassidy and Kid is in my eyes a charming, and very early, buddy movie. To me, its western, romance and true events depiction seem secondary to its being a buddy movie. Taken as such, it is entertaining, funny and exciting, but also banal, (as many buddy movies are), because it isn't really about anything.
But the film is good fun, in big measures thanks to its title stars, Paul Newman (Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)) and Robert Redford (All Is Lost (2013)), who build his career on it. From this point in western history, however, I do prefer other films like A Fistful of Dynamite (1971) and The Wild Bunch (1969).
Seen out of its historic context, today, Cassidy and Kid is a strange film. The 60s were a very different time. The film was immensely popular in America, and even won 4 Oscars, one of them for Hal David and Burt Bacharach's now classic song Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head. The film even holds # 148 on IMDb's top 250, and is thereby truly overrated. It is good, but a far cry from great.
Director George Roy Hill later made the similarly wildly popular The Sting (1973), for which he also won the Best Director Oscar.
Related review:
Giù la Testa/A Fistful of Dynamite/Duck, You Sucker! (1971) or, Sergio Leone's Cinematic Cornucopia
Watch some of the fun of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid in its trailer here
Budget: 6.8 mil. $
Box office: 102.3 mil. $ (US only)
= Blockbuster
What do you think of this 'classic'?
No comments:
Post a Comment